Archive for March, 2013

‘It is unclear why the company chose specifically to honor Chavez’s birthday’

(DAILYCALLER) — On Easter Sunday, Google is honoring the birthday of the late labor organizer Cesar Chavez by placing a Chavez portrait within the middle “o” of the Google logo that appears on the homepage of the popular search engine.

While Google frequently decorates its logo to celebrate various holidays and special events, it is unclear why the company chose specifically to honor Chavez’s birthday, instead of Easter Sunday.

Chavez co-founded the organization now known as the United Farm Workers union (UFW). He became an iconic figure in the labor movement, with his stature only increasing since his death in 1993.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/03/google-honors-cesar-chavez-on-easter/#V6eI62MJHgqlwzDh.99

Thursday, March 28, 2013 by: Lance Johnson

(NaturalNews) Control – this is what fuels many Congressmen and women. Recently, two U.S. senators met with President Obama, vouching for a biometric national ID card that would force workers to submit to a fingerprint, hand, or iris scan. Any worker failing to comply with this biometric tracking mandate, would be terminated from their job.

The program would be titled the “Believe System,” an acronym for Biometric Enrollment, Locally stored Information and Electronic Verification of Employment.

The ID card would contain a digital encryption key that would be required to match work authorization databases. The micro-processing chip on the card would store the biometric identifier. The worker would be required to carry this card and the employer would be forced to scan it.

Who’s behind this controlling proposal?

The two sponsors of the legislation, Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and Lindsey Graham (R-SC) say the new identification cards will “ensure that illegal workers cannot get jobs, dramatically decreasing illegal immigration.”

Their proposal would include additional border security, more temporary workers, and a form of amnesty for illegal immigrants already in the United States.

After meeting privately with President Obama, the senators plan was “promising,” according to Obama, and the president “welcomed” their new ID card law.

This biometric tracking system would force employers to refuse someone work who didn’t match up in the database, bringing up the question:

“What if freedom loving American don’t want their hands or eyes scanned?” In a free country, no one should be required to submit their body to such control. Many American’s already observe this control on a daily basis when they fly commercially. Whether they are being scanned by a radiation device or whether they are being patted up and down by TSA thugs, American’s should stand for their right to their own body.

Scanning your veins

In a recent interview with the Wall Street Journal, Schumer said: “This reform is the nub of solving the immigration dilemma politically speaking…If you say they can’t get a job when they come here, you’ll stop them.” The report also said the most likely type of biometric data to be recorded would be a scan of the veins in the top of the hand.

Previous national ID schemes have failed

Previous attempts of human cataloging have failed. In 2004, Rep. David Drier’s federal ID card plan failed, which included a photographed social security card with an encrypted electronic strip. In 2007, President Bush’s similar proposal failed, and not too long after, the Real ID Act failed as well. This law forced states to standardize driver’s licenses. Now, as tyrants attempt to catalog the populace, people can only hope that the tireless minority of freedom-loving Americans will rise up and stop these crazy biometric scanning plans.

It’s about control

This ID law would control employers as well, requiring them to have a government scanning device, or an “ID scanner” to verify the ID cards. This could lead to “ID scans” for anything, including routine purchases as well.

It’s obvious that laws such as these are not about immigration, just like the Affordable Care Act is not about health care.

Issues like these are almost always about control. The real fight is not right vs. left, democrat vs. republican. The real fight lies in the freedom of from government controlling and monitoring Americans’ every move.

What type of America do you want to live in?

To fight back against these mandated biometric scanning laws, join forces with pure organizations like “Campaign for Liberty.” They will keep you informed and lead the fight for personal liberty.

Sign their petition here: http://www.chooseliberty.org/nationalidcard.aspx?pid=0326b

Sources for this article include

http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-20000758-38.html
Campaign for Liberty urgent message
http://oathkeepers.org/oath/2013/02/03/push-for-biometric-national-id/
http://thehill.com

About the author:
Lance Johnson, along with his wonderful wife Kender, are creating a natural products movement from the ground up: Free Spirit All Natural Products. As more hearts are pulling toward natural solutions in a world of toxins and propaganda, Lance wants to help others see the real health opportunities all around us. www.allnaturalfreespirit.com

He’s also a passionate writer who has self published two works of poetic writing that relate to the people, unmask the hiding, and challenge the status quo. He has more writing ideas within him, as health and freedom has become a major topic of interest within him.

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/039683_biometrics_national_ID_card_mandatory.html#ixzz2P93H3wEz

Sunday, March 31, 2013 by: Jonathan Benson, staff writer

(NaturalNews) For more than 100 years, the profits generated by their sale have helped make it possible for young girls all across the country to develop valuable life skills and make their communities better places. But today’s Girl Scout cookies are loaded with health-destroying ingredients like genetically-modified (GM) beet sugar, high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS), and transgenic soy derivatives, and one young girl scout from California has had enough.

After discovering that Girl Scout cookies contained all sorts of processed, GMO-laden ingredients, young Alicia Serratos from Orange County asked her mother why the cookies could not simply be reformulated with non-GMO ingredients. Not knowing the answer, Alicia’s mother initially thought of simply writing the Girl Scouts organization a letter asking it to remove the GMOs, but eventually decided that a Change.org petition might be more successful.

So the two created one together, entitling it “Girl Scouts: Please make cookies with GMOs,” which quickly went viral gaining thousands of signatures from eager supporters. As of this writing, Alicia’s Change.org petition has 6,000 signatures and counting, and many more concerned Girl Scouts and their parents are signing on to the effort every single day.

“GMO studies (in animals) have linked them to infertility, immune problems, accelerated aging, faulty insulin regulation, and changes in major organs and the gastrointestinal system,” states the petition.

Girl Scouts organization claims GMOs are safe

On its frequently asked questions (FAQ) page, the Girl Scouts organization admits that its cookies contain GMOs, stating the following: “Our bakers determine whether to use genetically modified agricultural crops (GMOs) in Girl Scout Cookies based on a range of market-related factors.” The organization goes on to claim that it “feel[s] confident in the safety of all the ingredients in Girl Scout Cookies, including GMO ingredients.”

Apparently the Girl Scouts organization is unaware of the many recent studies showing the dangers of GMOs, including the widely-circulated review out of Europe showing that GMOs and the pesticides used to produce them can cause severe cancer tumors and early death. Surely those in charge of the Girl Scouts do not intend for their cookies to harm customers, but their insistence upon the alleged safety of GMOs without evidence is deeply concerning.

And though a Change.org petition is not necessarily the most prudent way to spark real change at the Girl Scouts, it is, at the very least, a spark that will help raise awareness about this important issue, as millions of Americans purchase Girl Scout cookies every year. So to help this process along, we are encouraging our readers to check out the petition and sign it if they are in agreement:
http://www.change.org

Another powerful way to send a clear message to the Girl Scouts about their use of GMOs is to simply stop buying Girl Scout cookies. As tough as it might be to resist those enticing Thin Mints and Samoas as you walk out of the drug store or supermarket, especially with all those cute smiles wooing for your support, refusing to purchase Girl Scoutcookies until the company reformulates a healthier, GMO-free product line is arguably the best way to promote change by voting with your wallet.

You can also contact the Girl Scouts directly and ask the organization to reformulate its cookies without GMOs, and without toxic ingredients like HFCS, hydrogenated oils, and processed soy:
http://www.girlscouts.org/contact/email.asp

So as not to punish the actual Girl Scouts, since they are not the ones responsible for adding GMOs to the cookies they sell, you can support them in other ways such as purchasing magazine subscriptions through their Magazine Program: http://girlscouts.qsp.com/Magazines.aspx

You can also offer a donation directly to the Girl Scouts without purchasing their cookies:
http://www.girlscouts.org/support/

Sources for this article include:

http://www.change.org

http://gmoinside.org

http://www.naturalnews.com

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/039719_girl_scout_cookies_GMOs_petition.html#ixzz2P92JdfEP

YouTube
March 31, 2013

Footage shows 8-year-old boy carrying AK-47, smoking cigarettes.

 

This article was posted: Sunday, March 31, 2013 at 6:48 am

 

Bill Anderson 
lewrockwell.com
March 31, 2013

Federal criminal law permits prosecutors to charge people with “crimes” even though they have not broken the law. Prosecutors make up their own narratives and federal judges and juries always buy them no matter how outlandish. Read this story and you will see what I mean. It is not illegal to make “traps” in automobiles, but federal prosecutors still can make that a crime and destroyed the life of Alfred Anaya and his family.

Law in Amerika is irretrievably broken. It cannot be reformed. Prosecutors, police, and judges have immunity and are untouchable by the law, and there no longer is a speck of decency among any of these people.

Read more

 

This article was posted: Sunday, March 31, 2013 at 11:38 am

Travis Holte
lewrockwell.com
March 29, 2013

Writes the owner:

The most of circulating assets on our business Current Account are blocked.

Over 700k of expropriated money will be used to repay country’s debt. Probably we will get back about 20% of this amount in 6-7 years.

I’m not Russian oligarch, but just European medium size IT business. Thousands of other companies around Cyprus have the same situation.

The business is definitely ruined, all Cypriot workers to be fired.

We are moving to small Caribbean country where authorities have more respect to people’s assets. Also we are thinking about using Bitcoin to pay wages and for payments between our partners.

 

This article was posted: Friday, March 29, 2013 at 1:40 pm

John McCormack
Weekly Standard
March 29, 2013

Florida legislators considering a bill to require abortionists to provide medical care to an infant who survives an abortion were shocked during a committee hearing this week when a Planned Parenthood official endorsed a right to post-birth abortion.

 

Alisa LaPolt Snow, the lobbyist representing the Florida Alliance of Planned Parenthood Affiliates, testified that her organization believes the decision to kill an infant who survives a failed abortion should be left up to the woman seeking an abortion and her abortion doctor.

“So, um, it is just really hard for me to even ask you this question because I’m almost in disbelief,” said Rep. Jim Boyd. “If a baby is born on a table as a result of a botched abortion, what would Planned Parenthood want to have happen to that child that is struggling for life?”

“We believe that any decision that’s made should be left up to the woman, her family, and the physician,” said Planned Parenthood lobbyist Snow.

Read full article

 

This article was posted: Friday, March 29, 2013 at 1:39 pm